Comparing “All Quiet on the Western Front” and “Band of Brothers”

All Quiet on the Western Front's basic role is to delineate the revulsions and real factors of war and responses of warriors towards it. Remarque describes WWI from the point of view of the crushed, Germany, soon after the war was done. It makes no endeavor to glamorize war, rather portraying the life of â€Å"a age pulverized by war. † Remarque utilizes this book as a voice of the fallen. All Quiet on the Western Front covertly condemns the German government and military for convincing youngsters to do battle. Therefore, the book was scorched and restricted in Germany. The book likewise shows how war has physical and mental impacts on men. Band of Brothers is a TV arrangement that follows the â€Å"Easy Company†. Simple organization is a piece of the United States Army. The arrangement is set in WWII in Europe. WWII is over 50 years before the arrangement in made. It is critical to take note of, that this film shows bravery of these men. This is fundamentally in light of the fact that the executive needs to connect with the crowd of America. Americans accept that they are victors and for this arrangement to be engaging this should be appeared. Anyway the abhorrences of war are as yet settled just as the troopers responses. The chief of this arrangement changes the officers responses anyway towards the end. Mateship and bravery in these dull occasions are appeared to significantly differentiate All Quiet on the Western Front's topics. Band of Brothers shows an assortment of fight scenes that uncover various responses of officers. In â€Å"Day of Days†, the assault against the mounted guns weapon toward the finish of the scene is made by troopers who are new to the experience of war. The assault, albeit befuddling to the Audience now and again, is composed and arranges are given and followed with clearness. Truly this assault is as yet utilized by WestPoint for instance of fine military activity. The chief utilized some unstable cameras to represent the shell shoot and the troopers developments. There are some incompletely clouded POVs shots encourages the crowd to detect authenticity of the occasion. Anyway for the most part the camera shots are midshot and longshot. This gives the crowd a general feeling of request to the grouping. The crowd is all around orientated. Given that this assault is viewed as an American Military Achievement, it is impossible that the chief would utilize cinematography to reflect disorder of such occasion. Rather than the unexpected assault in the scene â€Å"Last Patrol† shows various responses from the fighters. In this, the officers have been occupied with the fighting for certain months. Despite the fact that fight solidified, they are disappointed with war. The scene stresses how the officers are willing for the war to be finished. They are angry of being approached to cross the stream and to take German POWs and realize the dangers well. While attacking the structure, after Jackson ran into the blast of his own explosive, there is a change in true to life procedures. During this arrangement a swinging camera combined with different shots is utilized. This stresses the disorder as the view plays the job of one of the warriors in the room continually moving the sightline. It additionally close ups to the warriors' faces accentuating their feeling. The sounds are riotous and noisy. This disorientates the watcher. THe executive has utilized these methods to show how dangerous the circumstance is. The executive in this scene shows this perspective as he has more opportunity. He no longer needs to create the possibility of the â€Å"American saint. † After intersection the waterway, they go into the cellar. Here it is additionally disordered. The officers are confounded and are not in charge as they assemble around Eugene who is kicking the bucket. After his passing there is a stop in the gunfire, stressing the stun. Eugene, the surgeon has a voice over giving an individual view on the passing. â€Å"He selected young† causes the watcher to feel thoughtful for the trooper. In All Quiet on the Western Front, there are numerous instances of the responses of warriors. In fight, warriors act brutally so as to endure. They â€Å"have transformed into risky creatures. † This shows they utilize intuition to execute with no genuine waverings. They have to do this to endure.

Blue Ocean Strategy Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Blue Ocean Strategy - Research Paper Example To break out of red seas, the blue sea methodology hypothesizes that organizations must break out of the acknowledged limits that characterize how they contend. These efficient limits are recognized by the six ways system as: industry, vital gatherings, purchaser gatherings, extent of item or administration contributions, utilitarian passionate direction of an industry, and time (â€Å"Blue Ocean Strategy,† 2011). The principal way that we see Wii used to make a blue sea was the purchaser gatherings. Microsoft’s Xbox 360 and Sony PS3 depend on clients as their essential core interest. Hence their techniques are equipped towards expanding their clients experience through consistent advancement and sending of new innovations, for example, HD, designs, etc. Unexpectedly, Wii selected to target buyers and influencers for example guardians and doctors through advancement of items that everybody in the family can appreciate. This has improved the probability of state, guardians, buying Wii games rather than PS3 or Xbox 360 for their kids. The second way that the Wii used to make a blue sea for itself is the item scope. While the two significant gaming contenders adhered to the conviction that gaming was a safeguard for a specific age gathering, the Wii extended its market by creating items that could cut over all age bunches from pre-adolescents to senior residents. The Wii Healthy class of games includes items that grandparents and grandkids could without much of a stretch play with together.

Decision fatigue

Decision fatigue Last Saturday night, I was in my kitchen, looking down at two Pyrex containers on my counter. On the left was slow-cooked chicken thighs; on the right was grilled chicken tenderloins. My goal was to decide which I would have for dinner. I looked to the left, and the right, and back again, unable to pick, unable to think about picking,  for about ten minutes, before my phone rang and jerked me out of my stupor. A friend was in the area and asked if I wanted to get dinner. Rejoicing that once again capitalism would treat the symptoms without curing the underlying disease, I said that why yes, that would be great. So my friend asked the natural followup question about where or what I would like to eat, brightly rattling off several local options. I paused for a beat, then a few more. Uhh A solid minute of silence, broken only by more interjections of my own indeterminacy, passed by before my friend tentatively asked hey are you okay? Thats when I knew that decision fatigue had set in early this year. Decision fatigue  is a term from the behavioral psychology literature. It refers to the observed phenomenon that making decisions depletes your ability to make future decisions, either as well or, as in my case last Saturday night, at all.   It is not something I had ever experienced before I began my career as an admissions officer, but Ive come to recognize it as something of an occupational hazard, like being bleary-eyed, or having a crick in your neck01 Ive been seeing the same massage therapist for five years. Its gotten to the point where she can tell when, and how long, Ive been in committee by feeling which muscles are tight, and how tight they are. I am not making this up. from looking at an  external monitor  all day. I begin each reading season knowing that, from the moment I begin reading applications or serving in committee, my ability to make lots of decisions quickly and well is going to decrease. Theres no way to prevent it, only ways to manage it better. Its hard to manage decision fatigue for a few reasons. The first, and most obvious, is that its our  job  to make lots of decisions quickly and well; it is our job, in other words, to become cognitively exhausted, in the way that when I was a landscaper in high school it was my job to become physically exhausted. There are things we can do to mitigate cognitive exhaustion: Ive blogged before about how I structure my reading  into a block schedule, with intense periods of focused reading broken up by intervals of noncognitive activities like cooking, cleaning, or exercising, and we take mandatory breaks during committee, buy low-glycemic index snacks to avoid spikes and crashes, and try to structure our non-admissions related work (like redesigning a website, for example) outside of reading season to reserve our cognitive capacity for what really matters. But at a certain point, its our job to make decisions, and thus to become fatigued by them, and we cant avoid it entirely. The second is that decision fatigue doesnt observe work/life boundaries: making decisions at work reduces your ability to make them at home,02 In fact, if these conditions persist, they can be profound and life-altering: in 2013, emScience/em published an a href=http://science.sciencemag.org/content/341/6149/976article/a that found the extra marginal decisions that came with being poor, like needing to bargain-shop for commodities, cumulatively exhausted cognitive capacities, and disabled good judgment, equivalent to about a full night’s sleep, or 13 IQ points. and vice versa.  Most admissions officers dread reading season weight gain, which comes not so much from being more sedentary but from decreasing ability to observe a healthy diet and say no to a bag of chips (or four). Meanwhile, life decisions feed back into work: a friend of mine has been sick, and Ive been helping make a lot of medical decisions, and Im sure thats reduced my capacity to make as many admissions decisions at the same time. This is one reason why I food prep and wear the same rotation of flannels and sweaters this time of year: to routinize my life as much as possible, a longstanding practice helpfully validated in an  interview by President Obama, someone who had many more important decisions to make than me: “You’ll see I wear only gray or blue suits,” he said. “I’m trying to pare down decisions. I don’t want to make decisions about what I’m eating or wearing. Because I have too many other decisions to make.” He mentioned research that shows the simple act of making decisions degrades one’s ability to make further decisions. It’s why shopping is so exhausting. “You need to focus your decision-making energy. You need to routinize yourself. You can’t be going through the day distracted by trivia.” A third reason its hard to manage decision fatigue is because its initially hard to detect, because, in a corollary of the Dunning-Kruger effect, the same forces that exhaust your cognitive functions also exhaust the  metacognitive  functions that allow you to assess how exhausted you are. I knew that I was cognitively fatigued, but I didnt realize the degree until that conversation on Saturday night. In my post on MIT and/as Marathon, I wrote: When I was a grad student, I didn’t make time for sleep or exercise, or to eat right, and my brain suffered for it, because Descartes was wrong about dualism, and we must take care of our whole selves for any part of ourselves to improve. It is possible to overtrain your brain as much as you can overtrain your body. I’ve done both. Sometimes, knowing your limits is the only way you can expand them, like gently stretching a tight muscle rather than quickly snapping it. The thing is, its usually easier to tell when your body is injured or exhausted, because it  hurts  and it cant do things it usually can. When I went to the gym this morning and couldnt finish my warmups because I was so physically tired from the last week, that was a sign that I shouldnt do any more deadlifts, because my body was too tired to do them safely or well. After some difficulty with overtraining, Ive learned to become better at listening to my body; Im trying to become better about listening to my brain when it, too, hurts or cant do things it usually can. Normally, I try to reset on Sundays. My grandfather, an evangelical minister, likes to quote an old Baptist book of wisdom that the best rest is not idleness as such but rather a change of activity. Indeed, the book of Exodus prescribes crop rotations to reset the health of the land; the book of Leviticus prescribes debt jubilees to reset the health of a nations finances. For me, a reset usual means yoga, food prep, laundry, ironing, and maybe some reading or a video game.03 I used to watch football, but theres a bunch of reasons I try to avoid it now, so instead I have been on a big emGod of War/em kick. But then negotiating all the runic puzzles required too much choice, so I set it aside until I could get to a point of mindlessly murdering ogres again. But because of all this other stuff, Ive been unable to observe my own change of activity, and I can feel that cognitive debt accumulating. My hope is that a few days at home for the holidays will pay down the interest and float me through EA Decisions Day in mid-December. Id originally intended to catch up on a backlog of work over the next few days, but I dont think thatd be listening to my brain like Im trying to do, or doing whats best for me (and our applicants) moving forward. This time of year, I need to be careful where I spend my spoons. The backlog can wait. Thats why its a backlog. Ill try to eat a lot of turkey, read some  Earthsea, and make as few decisions as possible until Monday morning. I realize, belatedly,04 Perhaps because Im cognitively fatigued as I write this? ?_(?)_/? that one unintended effect of this post might make applicants concerned about decision fatigue with respect to their own individual application05 Now, one piece of practical advice I can give you with all of this context: this is why you shouldnt make your applications any harder to read, interpret, or evaluate than absolutely necessary. Everything in your file, from the way you use line breaks in essays to the fonts on supplemental materials, is going to make your application more or less marginally exhausting to read. One pragmatic reason why your college application is (probably) not the place to get too experimental, or to be internally inconsistent or erratic, at least for highly selective schools, is that each marginal interpretation adds to the cognitive load of understanding and evaluating a case, which in term makes it more likely that some aspect of your application will be misunderstood. I have known amazing students who were emterrible /emat filling out their applications (emlooks meaningfully at Nisha/em) because it was so erratic and chaotic it took extra effort to understand how awesome they actually were. Part of being your own best self-advocate is making your application emreadable/em above all else. to MIT. But I dont think you should be alarmed for a couple of reasons. First: some version of this is going to be true for basically  any  college you apply to, or frankly any sufficiently any competitive selection process at any point in your life. This is something I have learned to accept in my own life of applying for grad school and jobs, and it has liberated me from the debilitating perfectionism and anxiety often associated with applying to things.  Judge Hercules is a fiction; admissions realism is descriptively correct. Humans, with all of their strengths and weaknesses, are reading and interpreting your applications. If that is surprising to youthen I guess the blogs have failed you. Second:  any good institution solves for inevitable individual shortcomings with better process. I described above some of the ways that we take care of ourselves during this time of year, but we also have processes to try to correct for ambiguities and inconsistencies, e.g.  by having lots of  rounds  of reading and committee, with lots of different eyes looking at them at different times, and lots of different methods of framing applications that are deployed at different stages, so that the  cumulative  cognition allocated to each application is sufficient to give us confidence in our assessments. This process is  itself  exhausting, but its exhausting in a way that gets us over the finish line. Its also why, when people ask me to describe our process, I often do so as incredibly inefficient in a way that reliably produces good decisions. Not  despite,  but  because of. This is also a request, I guess, to please be kind to the admissions officers in your life this time of year. If we arent responding to your emails as quickly as you might hope, or if were in a daze at Thanksgiving dinner and cant figure out which sides to put where, just know its probably because we are reserving our cognitive capacity for where it counts most: making good decisions on your applications, as best as we can, until theyre all made. I dont have a good way to end this post, so here is a picture of me spinning something thats extremely on fire;06 Now that I think of it, spinning things that are on fire and trying to keep in them moving in the right direction while not being burned isnt a bad visual metaphor for my subjective experience of reading season. Ill leave it up to decide if this is a good or bad decision so I dont have to. pc Nastia at EC Day I've been seeing the same massage therapist for five years. It's gotten to the point where she can tell when, and how long, I've been in committee by feeling which muscles are tight, and how tight they are. I am not making this up. back to text ? In fact, if these conditions persist, they can be profound and life-altering: in 2013, Science published an article  that found the extra marginal decisions that came with being poor, like needing to bargain-shop for commodities, cumulatively exhausted cognitive capacities, and disabled good judgment, equivalent to about a full night’s sleep, or 13 IQ points. back to text ? I used to watch football, but there's a bunch of reasons I try to avoid it now, so instead I have been on a big God of War kick. But then negotiating all the runic puzzles required too much choice, so I set it aside until I could get to a point of mindlessly murdering ogres again. back to text ? Perhaps because I'm cognitively fatigued as I write this? ?\_(?)_/? back to text ? Now, one piece of practical advice I can give you with all of this context: this is why you shouldn't make your applications any harder to read, interpret, or evaluate than absolutely necessary. Everything in your file, from the way you use line breaks in essays to the fonts on supplemental materials, is going to make your application more or less marginally exhausting to read. One pragmatic reason why your college application is (probably) not the place to get too experimental, or to be internally inconsistent or erratic, at least for highly selective schools, is that each marginal interpretation adds to the cognitive load of understanding and evaluating a case, which in term makes it more likely that some aspect of your application will be misunderstood. I have known amazing students who were terrible  at filling out their applications (looks meaningfully at Nisha) because it was so erratic and chaotic it took extra effort to understand how awesome they actually were. Part of being your own best self-advocate is making your application  readable above all else. back to text ? Now that I think of it, spinning things that are on fire and trying to keep in them moving in the right direction while not being burned isn't a bad visual metaphor for my subjective experience of reading season. back to text ?